I have had the honour of
listening to former South African President Thabo Mbeki deliver a couple of
lectures. He shuffles and fidgets as he speaks, his beady eyes focused on
either his script or on the audience. Looking at him speak, one gets the
feeling that the wealth of knowledge and intellect cannot, will not, be hemmed
in, and he fidgets and shuffles even more to let them out. His mildly
impassioned baritone voice entrances as much as it holds attention – it holds
your hand as it takes you on an intellectual high, and in the end one really
doesn’t have a choice but be impressed. He exudes quiet but profound confidence
that belies his short physical stature. After all, he is a man who caught the
attention of the intellectual bigwigs of the African National Congress (ANC) when
he was just a teenager.
Thabo
Mbeki: The Dream Deferred tells the extraordinary story of an
extraordinary man. It is a detailed account of the life of a man who, drawing
attention from an early age with his precocity, gave his life to the ANC,
through exile during the struggle and in independent South Africa.
A common result of apartheid
was the utter destruction of family life, but in the case of Thabo Mbeki, it
became something akin to an understated tragedy. The ANC was his family. His
father, Govan Mbeki, caught up in the early hints of an anti-apartheid
struggle, was hardly around for his children as they grew up, and was then
sentenced to life in prison on Robben Island together with Mandela. His
marriage to Epainette, Mbeki’s mother, fell apart. Mbeki thus grew up with the
imperative that the struggle was more important than family; his comrades were
his family. Throughout the struggle, even when faced with the disappearances of
his own son Kwanda and his brother Jama, he placed the struggle on a pedestal –
all else came secondary.
This is the running theme in
this biography by Mark Gevisser. Mbeki has often been described as aloof, cold,
unfeeling, but this book dissects his motivations and presents him as someone
who couldn’t, given his background, have lived any other way. I was however a
little exasperated. I thought Mbeki and his family could have done something
regarding his brother, for instance, who disappeared in Botswana, and at least
have his remains brought to South Africa for proper burial. But then I caught
myself: it is easy to be judgmental when the implications of situations and
events aren’t fully apparent, no matter how much you may picture them in your
head as you read.
Indeed, Mbeki lived through a
time when dedication to the anti-apartheid struggle and movement was expected
to be unquestioned. Even to his own father, he was no longer a son but a
comrade. To Mbeki, his father Govan was no more than his mentors Duma Nokwe,
Oliver Tambo, and finally Nelson Mandela. Thus Gevisser explores the not
altogether warm relationship between father and son, tempered by the
imperatives of struggle. In fact, Mbeki is shown to have had more of a
father-son relationship with Oliver Tambo than with his own father.
An offshoot of this thread is
the fact that Mbeki was seen as a favored child of the ANC as soon as he was
noticed. We are cautioned however that, while he carried the Mbeki name, it was
his precocious intellect that stood him out from the rest. He nevertheless
faced some antagonism from fellow comrades of his age, most notably the late
South African Communist Party leader Chris Hani, who felt slighted by the
perceived favoritism. Indeed, Mbeki was coerced into scholarship in exile
(London and Moscow) against his wishes (he wanted to join the struggle
immediately after High School), and then made the then ANC President Oliver Tambo’s Political Secretary in Lusaka. Mbeki’s life therefore became a
series of mentorships, the most prominent of which was with Tambo. In the
latter part of the book Mbeki is shown to have come of age finally, winning the
ANC Presidency unopposed on his own (without the loom of Tambo), delivering the
highest percentage win of the ANC in national elections, and overcoming a
difficult relationship with Nelson Mandela.
Whether as a result of prolonged
exile or a natural aversion to violence, Mbeki’s approach to the struggle in
the late 1980s and early 1990s favored negotiations above all else, and this
antagonized him further with more militant comrades led by Chris Hani.
Gevisser suggests that perhaps
Mbeki was caught up in the tensions and confluence of the three main arms of
the movement – exile (in which he belonged), prison, and “underground” (those who
remained in South Africa but managed to operate without being arrested). Some
form of mistrust festered, even among the exiles, some of whom were in the “trenches”
in Angola and Mozambique while Mbeki trotted the world defending the movement.
He was thus seen as an untested comrade who insisted on talks, even talks about
talks, at all costs, and was viewed with suspicion. Further, Mbeki is shown as
being disdainful of establishing a home base, as Chris Hani and Jacob Zuma had
done with their respective ethnic communities. The perception was therefore
reinforced that he was out of touch with the masses and wasn’t a “people’s
person”.
Thus we see that Mbeki has
always been set apart, or set himself apart, from the rest, a fact that caught
up with him in the ANC National Conference in Polokwane in 2007 when he was
ousted as the Party’s President. There were no longer the shadows of Govan
Mbeki, Duma Nokwe or Oliver Tambo to watch over him. The ANC, his comrades, his
family, rejected him after having given over fifty years of his life to the
movement.
Mbeki is presented in this
biography as someone who has deep confidence in himself and his abilities, and
who maybe, as a result, somehow needed to prove it again and again. He has
always taken great exception to subtle racism, real or perceived. For instance,
he resented what he called the “Mandela exceptionalism”:
“Mbeki called this attitude “Mandela exceptionalism” when he was being polite; the “one good native” syndrome when he was not. The argument went like this: Africa was irredeemable, and Mandela was the only good leader to ever come out of it; once he left office, South Africa would sink like the rest of the continent into the mire of corruption and decay, as Nigeria had. It seemed to Mbeki that Mandela was actually colluding in the world’s impression that he was the “one good native”, the consequence of which was the perception that all other black leaders – Mbeki foremost – were incompetent…”
Mbeki’s prickliness at these
“subtle” and “unstated” forms of racism by the West was perhaps what hardened
his resolve against anti-retroviral drugs, an unfortunate blight on his
distinguished career, or what motivated his decision to defend Robert Mugabe, perhaps
rightly so. Perhaps it is because he thought the black man is not really free,
that the dream has been deferred, that he saw racism where it could have been
implausible. It motivated his African Renaissance philosophy to keep the
deferred dream alive.
Picture credit: Goodreads
After reading your review, on today of all days, I just downloaded this book, seeking to educate myself on the ANC. Being well-versed in the Sinn Fein, I believe there are parallels to be found, "common ground", if you will.
ReplyDeleteGood decision Dalton, you won't be disappointed.
Delete